ERC Advanced Grant · 2024
Autonomic Balance for Adaptive Decision Making
Why do some people make highly flexible approach-avoid decisions under threat, while others can only follow fight-flight impulses? Computational psychiatry has advanced formalizations on how utility functions shape optimal decisions. But decisions are made by embodied agents, equipped with potent and competing autonomic arousal systems: Approach-avoidance conflicts elicit stress and are marked by concurrent sympathetic and parasympathetic arousal. The impact of para- and sympathetic dominance on decisions is very different, but decision science has largely ignored autonomic balance, failing to explain altered decisions in real-life threats and anxiety. Leveraging theoretical innovations…
From the public funding record at EU CORDIS. Describes the funded project, not the reviews below.